Newsletter
This week's edition of The Blink: Carmen Sebe on why Europe's funding problem was never about founders trying harder, what turns institutional intent into actual allocation, How to Web in Bucharest, and the week's reads.
October 5, 2026
·
5
min read

The European private markets briefing you can't afford to miss. Deals, signals, and moves, decoded every Monday by SeedBlink.

In late September, the European Commission and the EIB launched a pact to bring institutional money into European technology. Thirteen institutional investors have signalled an intention to invest, through vehicles like the €15 billion Tech Champions Initiative and the €5 billion Scaleup Europe Fund.
Allow me to explain why this matters more than a press release usually does.
For years, the conversation about European funding has focused on the wrong layer. People ask why there are not more venture funds here, or why the rounds are smaller. But a fund is only as strong as the capital behind it, and in much of Europe that capital has been missing. Pension funds are restricted or unwilling. Insurers stay away. Family offices and angels sit on cash whenever the outlook is uncertain, which lately it always is. A fund has a ten-year life: you commit money now and see it come back a decade later. That requires patient institutions, and we have not had enough of them.
So the fix was never going to come from founders trying harder. It had to come from the money above the money.
Whether this particular pact delivers is another question. Thirteen expressions of intent are not thirteen commitments, and a voluntary framework is exactly as strong as the people who choose to honour it. The real test is whether the capital reaches beyond the largest funds in the largest markets, or settles where it was always going to settle.
Still, the diagnosis is finally right. That is not nothing.


Europe's institutional capital gap is unusually well measured, which makes it easy to see what a new pact is up against.
European pension funds manage over €3 trillion, and roughly 0.12% of that reaches venture and growth capital, according to research by European Women in VC, Pensions for Purpose and Venture Connections. Their US counterparts allocate over 10% of assets to private markets. The gap is just as visible in absolute flows: in 2025, US pension funds awarded $9.25 billion in venture mandates against $485 million from European pensions, per With Intelligence data.
The causes are structural rather than cultural. Pension funds in many member states face quantitative limits on how much they can hold in private funds, supervisory practice varies considerably across the union, and venture remains an unfamiliar asset class inside institutions built around fixed income.
So the useful question is not whether a framework is welcome, but what has historically converted intent into allocation. The most documented recent attempt is British. In May 2025, seventeen workplace pension providers covering around 90% of active defined contribution savers signed the Mansion House Accord, committing to allocate at least 10% of their main default funds to private markets by 2030, half of it domestically. That is also voluntary, and conditional both on fiduciary duty and on the government delivering a set of regulatory enablers. But it covers a defined pool of roughly £252 billion, names its signatories, sets a deadline and specifies a percentage.
The EIIP sits at an earlier stage. Thirteen institutional investors have expressed intent to invest through existing EU vehicles, and those vehicles carry size targets of their own, €15 billion for the Tech Champions Initiative 2.0 and €5 billion for the Scaleup Europe Fund. What does not yet exist is a per-investor percentage, deadline or defined pool. That describes where the framework currently sits rather than faulting how it was designed.
One more number is worth holding onto. European pension venture mandates rose 64% in 2025, from a very low base. The direction has already turned. Whether a pact accelerates it or merely describes it is the thing to watch.

See you at How to Web Conference 2026
How to Web returns to Bucharest this week, from 6 to 8 October, bringing together founders, investors, policymakers and ecosystem builders from across Europe.
Our team will be there throughout the event, so if you’re attending, come say hello.
On 7 October, our CEO and co-founder Andrei Dudoiu joins “Bytes & Bills”, a session exploring policy and advocacy for the Romanian and wider European startup ecosystem. The panel brings together speakers from across European institutions, national bodies and the startup ecosystem, including the European Commission's DG Research and Innovation, the European Investment Fund, EBRD Venture Capital and Romania's Investment and Development Bank.

Denmark 🇩🇰
Breye Therapeutics raises €67.5M Series A
The Copenhagen biotech closed an oversubscribed round co-led by Mission BioCapital and Novo Holdings to take danegaptide into Phase II in 2027. Retinal disease is currently treated mainly through injections into the eye, so a first-in-class oral alternative would open the door to treating patients far earlier than is practical today.
Germany 🇩🇪
Kuro raises €10M
The Berlin company raised €10M led by UVC Partners for an AI layer that reads the hundreds of thousands of documents behind a construction project and links them into one model. The timing argument is demographic: around 19,800 German construction workers retired in 2024, and as its CEO puts it, an industry that forgets faster than it learns cannot deliver on its contracts.
Denmark 🇩🇰
Pandektes raises €13.5M Series A
Founded by two people with no legal background, Pandektes now serves over 500 customers across Denmark, Germany and Switzerland, and raised €13.5M led by Alstin Capital to expand further. The more interesting part is the positioning: rather than competing with LexisNexis or Karnov as another research platform, it wants to be the structured legal data layer that everyone else's legal AI is built on.

Don't outsource growth to the algorithm
Josh Lu on why pouring content into a feed and hoping the algorithm does the work is an abdication rather than a strategy, and where the next distribution frontier is opening.
What you measure is who you become
Harvard's George Serafeim on the number a company talks about first in every meeting. Incentives shape what people do, he argues, but the headline metric shapes who they become, which is why changing it later is so hard.
Volume wins: scale, not exquisiteness, defines Europe's defence buildout
Onodrim's Aistis Šimaitis, formerly head of Palantir's European commercial business, argues Ukraine proved you would rather have a million of something than one of anything, and that defence rewards the capacity to scale over radical innovation.
Written by

Denisa Lacatus
Communication and Content Specialist
TABLE OF CONTENT
Share this article